Knowing how a permit to work system operates is only one half of being competent to work safely.
The other half is that those directly involved must have the right trade and job skills. Jobs that are subject to permits to work are by their nature of increased risk – and therefore the standards to which workers are trained is much more critical.
Therefore, training delivered, for example, via toolbox talks – will not alone suffice. This is not to say that this type of informal training is not useful or unimportant – only that there is no verification about its content or quality.
To be sure, job related training for permit to work tasks needs to be independently accredited by recognized safety organizations, trade bodies, or examination boards. This way, all concerned have assurance of the standard to which the training has been delivered and the likely level of competence of the worker involved.
Another aspect of this training relates to trade skills versus specific health and safety skills required for a job – workers need both.
For example, an electrician who has completed, say, a City & Guilds Electrician apprenticeship is likely to be competent to work with exposed electrical supplies.
However, what if the task they are undertaking also involves working at height and hot works – perhaps grinding? Their trade-based training is unlikely to have covered these areas.
Regardless of the role involved in issuing permits, supervising the work, or undertaking the actual job, all involved have a responsibility to check that the training undertaken meets the requirements of the job want to say something if there are concerns.
As a minimum, this means comparing training records against the task-based risks assessment that will have identified the main hazards involved.
If you don’t have the necessary training records, or you can’t see the training is there for others – then the message must be – do not proceed until the issue has been resolved.